Quote from: cryptoknows on Today at 08:41:47 AM

Hello friends. Recently, many new generation blockchains have emerged that are helping to integrate web3.0 much more intensively and faster than Ethereum can.

I am not asking you to scold in defense of a particular blockchain, I want to hear constructive comments that will help me determine whether there is any sense in such projects and how they will exist in the coming years.

As you already understood, now we will talk about the Solana blockchain and Near Protocol.

Technologically, these projects are very similar and solve the same problem - the scalability of decentralized technologies on the Internet.

The projects perform almost the same function, but the Solana ecosystem is much more developed than the Near Protocol.

but in some ways, Near is ahead of Solana's technological advancement. Offering by the user gas free DeFi by means of Aurora and low commissions with a maximum commission throughput rate of 100k tps

So this is my question. By and large, the functions of these blockchains are already performed by the BSC, what is the point of developing the same technological solutions?

Perhaps this is the same as Pepsi and Cola, in fact the same drinks, but someone loves Pepsi, and someone loves Coca-Cola.

Will the cryptocurrency market come to one solution? Or the market will continue to be replenished with new "drinks"

My money is on NEAR. Litteraly, i got into presale, so i'm already at around 100x on my money. But that aside, i think solana is not as good.
If i remember correctly, few days ago, whole SOL ecosystem was down