Quote from: yahoo62278 on Today at 04:59:59 AM

Now on to the others, If 1 person is tagged then all 3 should be tagged. Cabalism13 for running the charity incorrectly and making bad decisions, bl4nkcode for showing a poor example of how an escrow should operate, and crwth for agreeing to go along with it.

I am not going to tag any of them yet and I will give them more time to show more transaction proofs, not only images for their donation work.
It needs time to reproduce everything, especially if they had sloppy or no records keeping, but it can be done in few weeks top.

Quote from: yahoo62278 on Today at 04:59:59 AM

What I really feel we should do is get with all 3 of these guys and do some kind of audit.

Good luck in getting any real audit for this charity Cheesy

I am not sure how Bitcoin is exactly regulated in their country and how they converted BTC to fiat money, they later used for purchasing donation stuff.
In the end we still need to trust their word, because it's not easy to track any coins once they get in exchange wallets.

Quote from: yahoo62278 on Today at 04:59:59 AM

Now let's assume we get this whole mess figured out. Should the charity remain open? Will these guys ever have the full trust of the community again so they could operate the charity if they ran it correctly?

They are obviously keeping things open and still working, according to latest post in their topic made by crwth.
I would keep this running only if the come clean with previous work, and in future present exact amount of money/btc spent for something, along with images and short explanation.