Now on to the others, If 1 person is tagged then all 3 should be tagged. Cabalism13 for running the charity incorrectly and making bad decisions, bl4nkcode for showing a poor example of how an escrow should operate, and crwth for agreeing to go along with it.
You can tag them right now with a neutral rating with a reference to this topic, but without any incriminating evidence about the charity, painting red feels a bit overboard.
What I really feel we should do is get with all 3 of these guys and do some kind of audit. We need to know what the balance was at the time of the split( need to verify this via blockchain), addresses involved so it can be checked, expenses for these "activities" they did(receipts apparently are not available, but couldn't we figure out the money spent on these activities by figuring out what was given and the price of each thing?), and finally the balance left. They need to combine what's left, convert to crypto, and send back to the escrow address.
The problem with doing audits like this is that often there is no way to get a trace of what was spent on what, or even what money was sent for. The forum isn't the SEC, after all.