Quote from: The Pharmacist on Today at 05:45:50 PM

Quote from: yahoo62278 on Today at 04:59:59 AM

Now on to the others, If 1 person is tagged then all 3 should be tagged. Cabalism13 for running the charity incorrectly and making bad decisions, bl4nkcode for showing a poor example of how an escrow should operate, and crwth for agreeing to go along with it.

You're probably right on that, but I'm awaiting the final tally from the other two members. And I don't think I was being too hard on cabalism13 at all, since he clearly was mismanaging funds. Even if he thought he wasn't, his response to the community speaks volumes. This is not a person I'd entrust with my money, hence the negative trust.

Also, this isn't my fight since I wasn't a donator and had nothing to do with the workings of the charity, so I'm going to remain silent henceforth in this thread until or unless crwth and bl4nkcode explain themselves. However, as a DT member (and for my own trust list) I felt a negative was well-justified in this case.

Quote from: RapTarX on Today at 05:33:48 PM

<snip>

I don't know how long it took you to do that analysis, but I've no doubt an even more complete one could have been done by the three members in question if they had the inclination to do so, and it could probably have been finished on the 3rd day of this thread at the latest.

As I said, everyone is free to do as they feel is correct. Tag or don't tag, Noone would be wrong here.