Quote from: DooMAD on December 30, 2021, 02:23:48 PM

Quote from: sociopath1 on December 29, 2021, 10:03:18 PM

but atleast also promote its issues and flaws so that users are risk aware, and not just the utopian fantasy of bitcoin2.0 brand tagging.

i say this, but i know you wont bother even conceiving the thought. and just continue with your brand stealing auto fame and trust PR method of promoting deceptive utopia's

When are you going to give an honest appraisal on the flaws of your big-blocker ideology? Why can't you openly admit that you wish to compel everyone running a full node to bear a larger cost to achieve your preferred outcome? That's your fantasy. It's unlikely to come true any time soon. And what annoys you more than anything else is that LN isn't a fantasy. It's real and people are using it.

You're the one trying to sell utopia, where there are supposedly no tradeoffs in cranking up the size of blocks to squeeze in more transactions. Be honest for once in your miserable existence. Admit there is a cost to having larger blocks. Admit that you want those who secure the network to bear that increase in cost.

Ours is the pragmatic approach. If you wish to make lots of relatively small transactions, you have the option of paying for the same on-chain security as someone sending a vast sum, or you have the option of sacrificing some security and making some of your transactions off-chain. No one is being forced. We're just presenting the options.

You aren't giving people options. You're demanding that other people pay for your ideology. Only problem is, you can't make them. The people who bear the costs would have to volunteer to increase their burden. It's collectively up to them. None of your weasel-words and obnoxious behaviour can alter that fact.

If you have any better ideas (and let's be honest, you clearly don't), then we're going to continue highlighting the benefits of LN because Bitcoin isn't a dictatorship and most users seemingly don't agree with dumping the cost of greater throughput onto those who help secure the network.

you giving options?

you options is "bitcoin limits stay, bitcoin wont scale... if you dont like it f**k off"
do you want me to quote the number of times you have said to people f**k off to other networks (both **=uc and or)

scaling bitcoin is not your propagandised scripts of 2015-6 where your clubhouse of buddies pretend the only scaling solution is your sill rhetoric "bigblocker 100mb by midnight". i know you think thats the only option for bitcoin but you are wrong.

but here is the thing, we are not in 1999 of dial-up and floppy disks.
i can get a 1tb microxd card cheaper than a GPU
i can get monthly internet fibre of 900mb cheaper than just 2 fastfood meals

bitcoin does not need to jump to 100mb by midnight. so stop with that dead end rhetoric as if its the only option.

what you fangirls miss in your silly thought process. is that although you want fee's to rise to be more persuasion that people should avoid bitcoin.. that same make fees rise is the REAL reason less people will use bitcoin daily, and thus less people will run full nodes

the transactions cost being the "just of using bitcoin" is more of the problem not the hard drive/internet cost