Classic, classic franky. Keep repeating the same things... All over again, and again... Until his interlocutors stop talking. Pretending like we don't exist, like our arguments are completely invalid. This is known as phychological projection.

You're so convinced to be right that you've gone stone-deaf over the years. Well guess what: I'm not gonna give up this time. I'll say the last word.

This is another thing we've said gazillions of times. First of all, the existence of LN doesn't disappear on-chain transacting. It just makes it work more efficiently.

Secondly, you don't know what the price will be. Even if you increased the block size, if the price remains the same they'll stop gathering $800k at some point in the future. Only if the price got doubled on every halving they'd retain their income. Time has shown this never happens. The block size is neutral to security. The factor that affects the security is the market value which is essentially the incentive of the miners.

However it may be a good idea to increase it in the far future as even the closing and opening channel transactions will cost a lot. All I'm saying is that we should not rely on it. It's clear enough that you can't fit the entire population in a decentralized system. You need off-chain solutions.

With a very significant difference:  There's no trust. In those days you're referring I had to trust the bank, that they'll do what they say with the IOUs. At the moment, I don't have to trust anybody. I'm the bank. I can broadcast my force-closing channel transaction with none's permission any time I want.

You don't care about bitcoin as the only thing you're trying to do is to force us agree with you. You don't want dialogue, you don't want consensus. Haven't you yet understood what's the purpose of bitcoin after all?

This is not true. The LN exists for micro-payments only.