Quote from: eliale on January 04, 2022, 07:41:45 AM

Yes they are however, as previously said, if you wish to appoint a new one, I'll gladly consider it. The prcoedure is quite simple: your Arbiter will send the request to our, we will notify the Judge about the change and agree about the transfer.

The Rock CFO would never send 35500 euros to anyone he wouldn't fully control. He created this "arbiter" as a collective entity and is hiding its identity to hide this fact. I bet the "arbiter" was created last year and that he is one of the creators with full control over it. Which means that he is the arbiter.

He already confessed that he has full control over his "arbiter" and that he would receive copies of any documents received and would have a final word about any delusional release of funds, as quoted above on this thread.

He could show evidence that I'm mistaken, but he won't. The evidence would confirm what I'm writing.

He keeps lying about a judge. There is no judge, the case was archived or dismissed by the Italian prosecutor. There wasn't any communication to any of the email addresses that are on file and are quoted on the illegally published documents by him.

And he never notified the prosecutor of the identity of his "arbiter". It would be very easy for the prosecutor to confirm that he controls the arbiter. He would ended up jailed if he would, as sending money to (in reality) himself and pretending that he no longer has the money and owes me nothing is criminal fraud.

As is his custom he quietly ignores what I wrote about his lies on his invented norm that would regulate his criminal behavior on my case.