the average transaction fee for the last year has been over $2. and in the last 3 years has seen fee's of upto $60
Yes, for several days. But, everyday in average it's not more than a few cents for regular transactions. So what's your point? In 2016 there were transactions with fees up to
$1000. I agree that it's more than $0.07 usually, but not
a lot more.
the N of LN pretty much explains its a different network.
Congratulations Sherlock, but we never told you that it's the same network. We were telling you that it's the same currency, but the millisat subunit had blinded you. Find me
one post where I have told you that the Lightning Network is part of the Bitcoin Network. It's a layer, build on top of the existing network. It's a completely different network that works on an already existent network.
im not the one trying to ban users.
You're banning my time when I waste it trying to clear up your mess.
1. rath was pretending [...]
Rath consecutively pretends according to your sayings. According to you, he's a lying bastard who wants to harm the Bitcoin environment by working on a scummy project. Sorry, but you're the only person who sees things like that. I'm not going to talk about Rath's pizza for one more time. People can read the
discussion and judge by themselves if he's indeed a storyteller.
2&6. funnily enough a topic called "Re: is bitcoin scalability problem solve now?" was indeed about bitcoin scaling. and not advertising other networks
You don't get to decide what's off-topic and what's not. If you think one's post is off-topic report it. However, when a user talks about the scalability problem it's reasonable enough to see Lightning posts. You've stuck on the network thing. Move on.
Blackhat does not understand this fact, even when its in the title of said topic.
So within your limits, the only thing that we should discuss as a solution there would be to increase the block size. Or shouldn't we as it's officially your punchline?
also. balackhats opinions are not of his own mind. he says the exact same things as doomad did. like a script
'Cause I decided to shut your mouth in discussions where you kept talking about the same things.
but here is the thing. i dont actually ignore, delete message, request bans of the altnet supporters. i simply debunk their rhetoric adverts and PR campaigns of misleading other BITCOIN readers
And why would you? You feel like you're shutting us up with your heavily valid and reliable arguments. People usually act like this only when they feel really annoyed.
the insane thing is. when they want bitcoin to change to allow offramps to other networks, and they call for a exodus of users away from bitcoin, their response is that those not wanting to offramp/exodus off, those people then have a choice to exodus and offramp away from bitcoin if those users dont like the idea of being offramped.
Not that I understand the entire sentence, but you're probably talking about the awful way we're forcing our ideas again? Yeah, hey: We outnumber you. These ideas are supported by the overwhelming majority of the Bitcoin envisioners.
the insane thing is. when they want bitcoin to change to allow offramps to other networks, and they call for a exodus of users away from bitcoin, their response is that those not wanting to offramp/exodus off, those people then have a choice to exodus and offramp away from bitcoin if those users dont like the idea of being offramped.
Also, stop talking about our Lightning disagreements in here. It's off-topic, something that I've been blamed from you. If you want to continue this further create a thread in the Bitcoin Discussion and humiliate me.