BIP-148 was never used to activate anything and I personally consider it an attack against bitcoin.
You bringing up here as an argument is another reason why people consider your posts FUD.
the NYA signalling threshold which activated the bip 148
This is a lie.
that then disregarded old blocks to fake a 100% listing of bip9 segwit blocks
You keep repeating the same lie but "disregarding a block" means chain split. Show us the chain split that happened in 2017 with the blocks that weren't signalling and were disregarded? You can't because there was no such thing.
the blue line is the NYA(148) people agreed to the NYA meaning the blueline(148) reached its threshold and activated.
part of 148 is to ignore old blocks on august 1st. and guess what happened on august first BCH
if you want to pretend there was no chain split.. then you are ignoring the existance of BCH
if you want to ignore that 148 and 91 happened then you are ignoring all blockdata of the 2017 time period that contains the mentioned flags in those bips.
so instead of shouting a narrative of a story you were told by a buddy.. try using blockdata and also actual bips..
.. dont deviate by showing other bips. dont rationalise your story with other events.
you may not like me. but you cant honestly be saying that the blockchains immutable ledger is lying
.. it was a nice try on your part to try and defends your buddies versions of stories they also heard. but try to stick to hard data and reference-able code.. rather than stories.
seems out of all those that talk of version of events. i am the only one that has shown the graphs that reference the block flags and referenced the split causing BCH and the bips used to do it..
everyone else has just been screaming "wrong coz misinforming troll"
your entitled to think im a toll. but atleast do the research now and again, it might teach you something that counters the buddy narrative