Quote from: franky1 on Today at 06:45:41 PM

only difference?
you forgot the lack of being a seeder to other peers for their IBD

No, I didn't. Lack of being a seeder is less services.

Quote from: franky1 on Today at 06:45:41 PM

if there is a hack. the fullnode checks the blockchain hashes and if the data matches, the blocks do not get rejected and so life continues

Alright, so what prevents the hacker from changing your Bitcoin client binaries and not do what you're saying? If we're going to examine what happens in a scenario where a malicious person reaches our computer, I can provide many arguments why having a full non-pruned node or not won't matter security-wise.

Quote from: franky1 on Today at 06:45:41 PM

i know you dont believe in blockchains and you are trying hard to drive people not to use blockchains.

I know you see everyone biasedly, but that's okay. You can't hurt me without my permission.

Quote from: franky1 on Today at 06:45:41 PM

he didnt mention which software he had and i didnt ask

It doesn't matter. What matters is that you can run a pruned node and have the entire UTXO set. You can verify everything and not keep everything.

Quote from: IadixDev on Today at 06:58:51 PM

If im not mistaken when the pruning mode is enabled you can chose the amount of data to keep ( eg 2gb ) so it seems incompatible in the principle to being able to keep everything with a fixed space didnt seem to me it was keeping all the chainstate but maybe im wrong.

You weren't wrong. It isn't fixed the data it stores. The chainstate gets bigger during syncing.