Quote from: Stalker22 on January 09, 2022, 10:10:45 PM

Quote from: dezoel on January 09, 2022, 09:33:54 PM

I get that you may compare it to some other places, I get that you may say "but you are giving so much information on places like facebook, instagram and so forth" but none of that matters because one place being dangerous doesn't mean the other is fine for doing the same. KYC is a risky business, and it should always stay away from something like gambling, I get it on exchanges but casinos are a bit more sensitive for people who are not even criminals.

I agree with that. The primary reason I enjoy playing at Roobet is because it has proven to be a good and honest casino. However, I was initially drawn to it for the anonymity it offered its players back then. Then came KYC. I found the introduction of the KYC to be a bump on the road that I had to deal with in order to continue using the platform. Fortunately, the Level 1 KYC only requires basic personal information. Had that not been the case, I would have had to "suffer" at some other online casino. Wink

For me, KYC level 1 regarding basic information is not KYC who has to submit documents, but obviously Roobet still provides anonymity even though there is basic personal information at that level, so this can be made up of pseudonyms and it can already be roobet, this will not suffer for others who don't like KYC and still crypto gambling still applies anonymity system as the main thing, except this abuse will be asked by KYC to submit other documents.