Quote from: rustyh17 on March 25, 2014, 07:07:13 PM

Quote from: sparky999 on March 25, 2014, 04:30:31 PM

I think there are plenty of people with lawyers on stand by right now

I would submit that proceeding collectively could maximize our voice and minimize the individual
expense of legal representation (if that is necessary).

I have received some PMs from interested parties. I still see wisdom in acting collectively regarding
any formal legal responses from LRM. I would appreciate a PM from you either way (collective or
individual approach), so I can get a head count. If we don't build a majority group, our response
will have little impact.

By the way, I'm not the type that does much of anything "collectively". I'm mostly doing this to try
and maximize our voice and minimize the cost associated with this process. I am also not doing
this to establish some sort of leadership position in this group. I would just as soon let someone
who has a little less skin in the game be our chief advocate. If your decision to act collectively or
individually is still on hold until you hear what LRM legal comes up with, that is fine too. I will submit
that getting a team put together ahead of time is more proactive than reactive. In my experience,
when I have behaved proactively in my past situations, it has always served me better than
when I behaved reactively.

So, bondholders, please PM me one way or the other at your earliest convenience.

Thanks,

Rustyh17