Quote from: Obito on Today at 05:56:45 AM

Quote from: Haunebu on Today at 02:37:27 AM

Also, many posters would have gladly joined this campaign if 1xbit's reputation was positive, but they avoided it primarily because of their negative reputation which was why they were forced to accept people like you.

I don't think so, some people were still joining this campaign and the red trust given to 1xbit didn't seem to faze or deter this people from joining this campaign, they even got their own red trust for joining the campaign which is the right thing to do so as to brand who has morals or dignity. I am still a bit sad about this though as they are still doing campaign which means that they are still stealing from people outside the forum.

Honestly, half or even more than a half of those red flags that I can see in most 1xbit signature campaign participants profiles are more about emotions than about facts:) not the best casino by the way. The idea of attributing red flags was good by the way, but what we can see currently, it is not working as it was designed to work. Unfortunately, the same is with blockchain. From one of the cutting-edge technologies, distributed ledger became a machine gun firing various tokens and the opportunity to play on the price difference instead of being useful for real-life needs. I don't mean it is useless at all. But it is not what it is intended to do. The same is with the red flags. It works but not in the way it was intended to work...