they are trying to put a voluntary feature of one software piece, into becoming part of the official BOLTS protocol, that all software would have to try being compatible with.
I want facts, not words. Where have they seem agreed with this feature?
(then later contradict by saying you think its a dumb idea.. but atleast your honest at that last part)
I never believed it was a good idea to contradict it. You keep making things up for the millionth time. Stop it, 'cause readers can't acknowledge when you're a liar and when not as they don't read the whole page of your walls of meaningless text.
people may not like my views on finding the flaws and bugs and faults.. but in coding, finding bugs and flaws is more helpful rather than being a PR utopian dreamer of hope and broken promise.
You've tired me with the PR thing. What makes you think what
you are doing isn't public relations? You're propagandistically trying to persuade people to not use Lightning.
Excuse me for not responding to the rest of your garbage-post. I'll stick with this:
You also have a flaw, and worse than that, you're not even working. LN is working even with flaws.