Quote from: franky1 on Today at 02:27:35 AM

there are litteraly thousands of people that want bitcoin to evolve(not altnet solutions)

Whatever number of people your vivid imagination leads you to believe you have on your side, it clearly isn't enough. Learn consensus.

Quote from: franky1 on Today at 02:27:35 AM

i am just the ones that you get triggered by because i have done my research and can show stats and code to back it all up. and you hate it.

After almost a decade on this forum, I've not once witnessed you use the work "research" in the accepted context. You don't do research. You do confirmation bias and conclusion shopping. You only search for things that reinforce your ridiculous preconceived notions. All of your "stats" are technobabble nonsense, all of your ridiculous ascii-diagrams are horseshit and you've proven time and again that you're not a coder and deliberately misinterpret the code comments to twist their meaning to suit your hollow arguments. You borrow arguments from scammers like CSW and then pretend you have the best interests of the network at heart. You spout totalitarian nonsense about preventing devs from coding what they want and then pretend you care about freedom. If you don't want people to perceive you as scum, stop acting like scum.

Quote from: franky1 on Today at 02:27:35 AM

im informing people using stats and code..

Wrong. In order to inform others, you would first have to be correctly informed yourself. You are clearly not correctly informed. You are a source of disinformation. Either you don't understand the code or you are lying about what the code means.

Quote from: franky1 on Today at 02:27:35 AM

anyway you are one of the typical 12 fans of altnets i was talking about..
where YOU think you have the authority(god complex) to tell people to fork off and go away and shut up when they dont tow the line and kiss your ass

I'm just pointing out the futility of continuing to use a protocol that you fundamentally disagree with and then whining about how it doesn't work the way you want it to. I'm happy with the protocol, so it makes sense for me to continue using it. If it worked the way you wanted it to, where devs aren't free to code what they want, softforks were somehow disallowed and users were coerced to bear a greater resource cost for running a node, I wouldn't stick around to constantly bitch about it. I'd use some common sense, leave and use something else. Why do you have no common sense?

Quote from: franky1 on Today at 02:27:35 AM

no surprise you would turn up.. did blackhatcoiner contact you and ask you to back him up..

I know reading comprehension isn't one of your strong suits, but I posted in the topic before BlackHatCoiner did. But keep giving in to your paranoia and conspiracy nonsense.

It couldn't possibly be the case that multiple individuals have separately arrived at the conclusion you're a raving crackpot. No, it's clearly an act of collusion. We're all out to get you because you're such an unrecognized genius and we just can't handle the envy. Yeah, that must be it. Roll Eyes

Quote from: franky1 on Today at 02:27:35 AM

anyways.. glad your admitting your influencer devs are holding bitcoin back.. one step forward by you admitting such

Literally never said that. Devs have a duty of care to protect the network from raving lunatics who think they know what scaling is. They're doing a fantastic job.

Also, you're holding yourself back. You still can't bring yourself to answer a few simple questions about freedom and consensus. See if you and do it this time:

Quote from: DooMAD on January 15, 2022, 05:59:28 PM

Consensus:

8. Any developer is free to code what they want.
agree[ * ] disagree[ ]

9. Everyone will be free to run any code they choose.
agree[ * ] disagree[ ]

10. If enough people run code with different consensus rules, change can happen even if a minority disagree.
agree[ * ] disagree[ ]

11. If you run code which is incompatible with the code a majority of users are running, you can be disconnected from the network.
agree[ * ] disagree[ ]

12. Features implemented by soft fork can be considered "opt-in" and you can continue to remain part of the network even if you don't want to use those features.
agree[ * ] disagree[ ]

13. If you are unhappy with the current consensus rules, there is no onus on any Bitcoin user to surrender to your demands.
agree[ * ] disagree[ ]

14. If anyone wants features which are wholly incompatible with current consensus rules, it is reasonable to suggest they consider looking at other projects geared towards that purpose.
agree[ * ] disagree[ ]

But no, you can't answer those questions. That would reveal the real truth. The one you don't want other people to see. You'll remain in denial about being a totalitarian fascist, because you lack the spinal fortitude to admit your true feelings.