~snip~
You are only judging it from the statement of OP. This accusation has so many obscure things. Pmalek has given a well example of it
This case has many whats and ifs. Both parties are like two opposing armies who have each other at gunpoint. But no one is shooting or negotiating the terms to lay down the weapons.
Someone created an account in a casino from unknown place by using a VPN service. Then he made a deposit to play, but suddenly the user changed his plan and asked the casino team to send his deposit back. So the question arises here:
Cloudbet will apply the funds confiscate rules (terms 11.4) if a user create an account and place bets from restricted countries. If OP is from a restricted country then why he made the deposit at Cloudbet by knowing the fact?
Some facts:
- The usage of VPN
- AML policy. (Making a deposit on the casino then requesting for withdrawal without placing bets).
- The casino have gambling license
Let's assume you are the government of a country. You have the law (casino license) where it is mentioned that you won't allow people from ‘A’ ‘B’ ‘C’ countries. A person entered in your country by using an illegal method (use of VPN) from an unknown place (it could be one of those restricted countries which is mentioned in the TOS). Now he wants to go back in his country without doing anything, but he knows that there is no way to leave your country silently (the withdrawal needs approval of Cloudbet team). So, the person asked you to let him go back in his place.
Will your government accept his request and send him back without any inquiry (by ignoring the law, by ignoring the illegal method he used)? Or you will ask him to verify his identity?