Quote from: odorico2006 on March 26, 2014, 07:25:47 AM

Quote from: communitycoin on March 26, 2014, 05:28:26 AM

Quote from: ehugh66 on March 26, 2014, 04:19:53 AM

the rule is not fair to everone .
so , it is just a joke!

keep calm list is big and we check each people one by one!
some senders not have bitcointalk user name
some senders less then 50 posts
some senders has not good quality posts
some senders not even read OP and posted this thread

we disqualifies those to protect crypto from lazy bears!

+1

I support the dev as this kind of qualification method is rather fair.
There is no absolutely fair on the earth. But I think this one is doing a great thing for Active Cryptocoin Community.
That's enough!

Hello, dear development team. I think you need Is it right? Too strict.
The release of 50 quality reply is this really necessary? Is it right? Can consider can reduce a little the audit criteria
I believe that if you do this, then this coin will have better development space.
I suggest, 50 recovery increased to 80 or 100, we can in the quality of this issue slightly lower standard of audit.
Do you think how this idea?