Quote from: KTChampions on Today at 02:17:41 PM

Quote from: EdenHazard on Today at 12:37:39 PM

The odds were true.

But the fact it's football where even a 0.001 percent could beat the 90 percent side , i'd say false to whoever call city as the absolute winner.
Look at leicester city odds when they won the league , they beat the bookies! They beat the what so called 'expert'

And talking about the oods like 7.65 and 82 , i would rarher risk my money on these two sides rarher a big bet on an 1.11.
I insist to call the title race still wide open especially for the two, mark my words i had this feeling ... manchester city going to get slipped and finish the season below the other two.

Leicester didn't beat the bookmakers when they won the league. On the contrary, it confirmed that the bookmakers were right - such events occur once every 50-60 years and there is nothing surprising in this. As for the choice on which coefficient to bet, it is necessary to look not for large or small, but for distorted ones. Read about value betting, it is described there.

Oh of course it's not something that surprising at all , it's been predicted , you were right, the bookmakers always right with their statistics expert and paying out such 5000-1 has been prepared from the 50-60 years ago , it's not beating the odds yeah of course , it's been calculated.

End of the story.
Damn man , come on .. nobody expected that 5000-1 become reality , unthinkable , yet you insist .. idk what to say.

Let's back to liverpool , chelsea and the other top 5 teams odds to win the league , anything to comment in compare to a 5000-1 leicester that predicted occur once in 50-60 years?