Quote from: Marvelman on Today at 01:27:26 PM

Quote from: acroman08 on Today at 08:43:23 AM

I completely agree with Naficopa. things like this should be done at a later part of the year since our decisions will be based on how they performed or how good their reputation has become.

Quote from: Beparanf on Today at 03:08:18 AM

SandboxCasino: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5384549.0 (Still new but there campaign is managed by reputable manager Hhampuz)

I don't think this is a good way to decide whether a casino is reputable or not. let's not forget that adkinsbet signature campaign was also managed by Hhampuz(no offense to Hhampuz).

I totally agree with you. Firstly, I think Hhampuz is probably one of the best campaign managers here, but I don't think that this should be a criterion for judging the legitimacy of the casino. I believe Hhampuz himself would agree with this. He is of course an experienced campaign manager, and I am sure he will stop the campaign at the first sign of trouble, however he can in no way guarantee for aspects beyond his control.

This is the best comment here. Yes, Hhampuz can't do what is beyond his control and this is why gamblers should check everything on their own. Even if the campaign is managed by a trusted campaign manager.