So anyone out there with a good camera that can take very clear pics of areas will be a hero to me besides the guys who worked all this out in first place 
camera? i have something better, wait a sec 
oh, sorry. i tought scanning it with 1200dpi would produce better results,
but the focus got not far enough, even with my real tube ccd scanner
Thats a really good picture. Nice work
.I am looking for a way to make the "pencil" mode more time efficient. That would mean for me, that i will solder the correct resistor there that you reach 1.01V and the rest will be given by the pencil then. (lets assume you can go +- 0.01V with pencil mod, without changeing the voltage when occasionally sneeze on it.)].
OC Unit (2 bridge pin mod, 950mhz)
I measured 120,7 kohm on r211 and 0,3v
I measured 65.6 kohm between r211 and r212 1,09v
I measured 60kohm, 0,8v r212
OC+ Unit (1050mhz and 39k 1% resistor + pencil mod)
I measured 7 kohm on r211 0,03v
I measured 60.2 kohm between r211 and r212and 0,82v ( i measured it twice, i rubbed a little on the carbonglue and needed to recheck: 61kohm, 0,85v)
I assume 60kohm, 0,8v r212 (was not changed, so it should be the same)
65,6kohm / 1,09V = 60,18349kohm/ v * 1.01v = 60.785kohm
60.2kohm / 0,82v = 73.41464kohm /v * 1.01v = 74.149 kohm
(61kohm/0,85v = 71,7648kohm/v * 1.01v = 72,482 kohm)
(not sure where this offset comes from, i just assume that is just not a linear ?,(but i will try linear interpolation) )
Interpolation:
x = 1.01v; f(x)[kohm]; f0 = 60,2kohm,f1 = 65,6kohm, x0 =0,82v; x1 = 1,09v
f(x) = 64kohm
So my assumption would be, that ill get 1.01v when i can set the resistance between r211 and r212 to 64kohm.
Achievable that way:
x = (1.01 -0,8V ) = 0.21v; f(x)[kohm]; f0 = 7kohm,f1 = 120,7kohm, x0 =0,03v; x1 = 0,3v
= 82,8kohm
So in short: i need to replace the R211 with 82,8kohm and i would get a steady 1.01V.
Please confirm if correct.
Well it was wrong. Reason for that is that R211 and R212 are parallel. so it will be calculated different.
On my currently modded unit, i remeasured things. Looks like as i did a little overshoot with the carbonglue
... As it got hard, it was more conductive and my pll voltage is now 0,82V:I know that it is not a 24h run, and i am scientifcly very sorry for that and will post one the next days. In our first run it was much more stable, when the voltage was at 0.94V.
I will reduce som of the carbon glue and will rerun a new test.
Is there actually a scientific proven reason, why 1.01V shouild be the sweatspot ? In our sample, i could not measure any differences.
Can also someone specify which size the smd resistors are currently ? I mean which type of smd resistors (to be exact: which size?) are they ?
No there is no benefit in increasing the PLL voltage.
regards,
nemercry