Quote from: gadado2 on Today at 11:28:25 AM

Quote from: xkcdd on Today at 10:38:40 AM

Quote from: gadado2 on February 22, 2022, 03:48:46 PM

(*) My main problem is that I can not vote from the MN collateral value simple because it is offline encoded and stored and not simple at all to access. It's a day work at least and then there is eighter taking the risk to bring it online which is a no go for me or work with offline signation. Very unpracticable.

Hi Gadado2, please review my guide on how to create a perfect masternode, it makes voting so much easier, you really should vote without those votes we have a tough time improving Dash. Feel free to contact me personally for more information.

https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/how-to-create-the-perfect-masternode.52717/#post-229848

Thanks I think I will check the next time I open my command and collection wallet about the voeting.

Actually when the new registration system came out it is what I tried to do..proper separating and isolating the collateral from all the rest.

So the MN's all do payouts to the one command and collection wallet which I tempoary put online every maybe 2 or 3 month to empty it out (*).
It's also the wallet I send the registrations and restarts commandos from and likely also will have the voteing addresses although like said on registration it wasn't possible to have an independent voteing address. That means one of those addresses hopefully in the command and collection wallet is also my voteing address. Therefore I guess it should work to vote with it. I will see then.
Anyway I really only will vote when there is something important but i might miss it because I only read this forum.

(*) doesn't means selling..I just move them to some other place. The decition of selling coins depends on other things.Just saying this because we had it about the miner MNs owner relation and who is selling.

Quote from: Pang. on February 22, 2022, 08:00:59 PM

I have been hearing since 2017 that EVO was almost ready, and we are in 2022 and we continue with this time, yes, everything is ready... what if we take another two or three years?

That's exactly how it should not have been and bothers me too. How could that happen. Let one wonder where the development money went to. But more than that all the world marked penetrations seems to have stalled. So even if you come out with EVO now ...who is going to use it?

A budget of thousands of dollars should be audited by the network itself when it comes to rendering accounts and achieving objectives.

I can ask the 2000 Dash network and promise that I will develop with my team a decentralized payment network, social network, storage and everything in a few months.

I'll get my 2000 Dash, I'll do nothing, and time will pass. Then I'll say I'm sorry, I need another 2000 Dash and another six months... so long as there are fools who believe me. I'll fill my pocket and then I'll disappear

this is OK?

I'm not saying that was Ryan's intention. But analyzing it as an investor, I cannot approve of the management carried out in the last five years.

We have seen projects that have applied for funding from the network for years. Some have managed to finance themselves and others have lost interest and have lost financing.

From now on, approved budgets should be linked to achievements with their obvious margin of error. We can hire 25 developers who play GTA all day long, or we can have 10 of those 25 that are extraordinary, 10 that are average, and 5 that are mediocre. Should everyone get paid the same?

I don't know if you know where I'm trying to get to. I just think that if we dilute the value of Dash by issuing coins for the development budget, that development will need to return value to Dash in a fundamental way.

For example Crowdnode, has requested funding, and it has been delivered. it will give Dash an added value, and over time Crowdnode will not need more funding because it will be self-financing with its project, while making Dash better.

This is what we have to look for.

More than a year ago...maybe two. I announced that Dash would lose the top 100 capitalization.

This is going to happen inevitably.

Coin constantly dilutes value (miner, MN, budget)

It is normal that if Dash does not deliver more added value than it dilutes, the price will go down.

Apple can dilute thousands of shares each year, and gain value.

why? Well, because every time it delivers better and more demanded technology. This makes it no matter that there are more stocks on the market because people use apple.

If people use the dash network, either to pay, to store, or as a social network, chat... or whatever. The dilution will be less than the price increase.

We will see if the dash platform manages to reverse this problem.

All the best