Quote from: BlitzCoinDev on March 27, 2014, 05:46:13 PM

Quote from: mr.pj on March 27, 2014, 05:42:38 PM

Quote from: BlitzCoinDev on March 27, 2014, 05:24:59 PM

Quote from: mr.pj on March 27, 2014, 05:22:33 PM

The current p2pnode status is as follows

all nodes are on the correct chain
the largest p2pnetwork ist the one that we provide with the highest hashpower (180MH vs. 50MH)
omarG's sourcecode still refers to the old network
omarG refuses to switch back, even though it is easier to switch 3 nodes than 7+ total right? Especially while omarG is/was in contact with the pool owners

For the benefit of p2p it would be best to only have 1 network - and I propose to use the one with the largest amount of nodes and hashrate..

what code are you using now? do I need to remove source code from OP?

I am using the code from omarG and now it is working - but the network prefix is still on the old network.
As for now you can leave it since all nodes are on the correct chain and no more problems will occur.

I encourage omarG to move back to the old p2pnetwork and then its one big network.

Other option is that I push a new sourcecode to git and things can be resolved.

Either is fine - pm me for what solution you prefer

I prefer one P2Pool network, hence I'll remove the code if all other pools are using different

If you prefer one p2pnetwork than removing the source is not the solution

The solution is to move back to the old network prefix since this is used by almost all p2pnodes available

just my 2 cents

E: the source of omarg uses the old network prefix ...