Re: Why BTC POW is technically moving towards an dead end
A Comparison to Bitcoin PoW, is if any one knows the 3 to 4 mining pool operators that have over 51% hashrate, all they have to do is corrupt them.
What to corrupt exactly? The pools? The miners of those pools? The owners of the pools?If you still don't understand , and still are not believing even the person who won a turing award.
No, I don't. In this field, we eliminate trust, we don't include it. And to be honest, I won't believe any person who'll come and try to convince me for their invention with their honors instead of their actual work.Take some computer programming classes until you find someone that can explain it to you.
May I assume you haven't fully acknowledged how it works too?I don't believe in 'argumentum ab auctoritate'; we don't do that in science.
This reminded me of Feynman. 
Except that no merchant would consider a new not yet proven altcoin (one of 10,000) instead of 10+ years standing Bitcoin.
Hmm, I suddenly feel an association swinging around my head. Couldn't the same thing be said for the hundreds of years standing fiat currencies back in 2009? I think this changes the subject; we currently examine the potential of a crypto. In other words: Its underline technology.