Quote from: LegendaryK on Today at 09:29:02 AM

A Comparison to Bitcoin PoW, is if any one knows the 3 to 4 mining pool operators that have over 51% hashrate, all they have to do is corrupt them.

What to corrupt exactly? The pools? The miners of those pools? The owners of the pools?

Quote from: LegendaryK on Today at 09:29:02 AM

If you still don't understand , and still are not believing even the person who won a turing award.

No, I don't. In this field, we eliminate trust, we don't include it. And to be honest, I won't believe any person who'll come and try to convince me for their invention with their honors instead of their actual work.

Quote from: LegendaryK on Today at 09:29:02 AM

Take some computer programming classes until you find someone that can explain it to you.

May I assume you haven't fully acknowledged how it works too?

Quote from: n0nce on Today at 09:59:12 AM

I don't believe in 'argumentum ab auctoritate'; we don't do that in science.

This reminded me of Feynman.

Quote from: n0nce on Today at 09:59:12 AM

Except that no merchant would consider a new not yet proven altcoin (one of 10,000) instead of 10+ years standing Bitcoin.

Hmm, I suddenly feel an association swinging around my head. Couldn't the same thing be said for the hundreds of years standing fiat currencies back in 2009? I think this changes the subject; we currently examine the potential of a crypto. In other words: Its underline technology.