Quote from: IloveAnonCoin on March 27, 2014, 10:51:35 PM

Quote from: darkproton on March 27, 2014, 10:47:16 PM

Quote from: IloveAnonCoin on March 27, 2014, 10:01:18 PM

Quote from: eduffield on March 27, 2014, 05:30:54 PM

Quote from: IloveAnonCoin on March 25, 2014, 08:40:23 AM

X11 and SHA3 ( Keccak ) are not ASIC resistant at all, according to NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), if you want to become SHA3 candidate, you need to be able to create by ASIC. AND every algorithms in X11 used to be SHA3 candidate until Keccak win the competition and become SHA3.

Here is the paper : http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/hash/sha-3/Round2/Aug2010/documents/papers/SCHAUMONT_SHA3.pdf

The whole point of X11 is to try and get the same network growth cycle as Bitcoin. Once Darkcoin is worth enough, people will invest the capital to create the ASICs. I never really had an issue with that, in fact that was the point of creating a new hashing algorithm, I think it will be healthy in the end to move to ASICs.

So that means you never have intention to DO ASIC resistant since BEGINING.....

Why I need to invest in your coin if they is nothing different from BITCOIN Huh

?

please research.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=538464.msg5931533#msg5931533

Its decentralized (unlike zerocash, zerocoin, etc) <<<<<< Have you research ?

They are building decentralized processes.

My only hesitation with Zerocash and zerocoin implementations - e.g. anoncoin - is they have publicly declared that the initial start process requires a trusted third party and there is a small risk that that third party can build back doors.

Zerocash also might suffer from the initial government funding of the project.