Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 05:03:46 AM

Quote from: Protox.App on Today at 01:39:43 AM

Quote from: holydarkness on March 08, 2022, 04:25:21 PM

Quote from: Protox.App on March 08, 2022, 04:11:43 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on March 08, 2022, 03:51:39 PM

I think I'll take one point by one others to keep the focus steady. So, I'll took my first point and pick up the four others later once the first one cleared up.

Were you referring to gas fee? Because DEX's fee --as I previously said-- is very small. Uniswap and sushi took 0.3% while PCS is 0.25%. Now if you're talking about the gas fee, there's literally nothing a dex platform can do, as this rate is determined by the miners, which again, kinda solved by the emergence of low fee chains like BSC and polygon. With those said, it means the only factor a dex can manipulate is their fee itself, so the question would be: on what rate will your DEX be that you're confident enough you'll appeal traders to use your platform because you "solve" this high fee problem?

Zero Fee system, how would that work?
We can take our fees from other products such as The Launchpad, NFT Marketplace and The Liquidity Pools.

If you could apply this rate, I'll have to admit that it'll be quite appealing and a possible bargaining power against PCS --leave Uniswap from the equation as their erc miners fee is obviously can not be compared here-- however, will this decision impacting other aspects of your platform, e.g. your fees for launchpad, NFT marketplace and LP will be higher than other platforms?

If this decision could affect other aspects of our platform we wouldn't do it, it will be the cheapest and the best platform.
Most projects just think about getting rich by either taking high fees or by dumping their team tokens and minting more...
We have a fixed total supply of 100M and we have already locked 50% of the total supply (Proof).

So, in exact number, what's your rate for each of your feature?

And with point number 1 almost cleared, I am adding point 2 and 5 simultaneously as they're within the same topic. What'd you propose, then? For both the improvement in security and the clean DEX.

You're certainly wouldn't be that naive to think that just because you said you're clean and conduct a research before listing a project, your platform will be 100% free of rug-pull projects and that people would be totally assured --especially those with bitter experience of 2018 ICO fever-- that all of the projects you hosted is shady-free? Unless there a guarantee or some other method you propose to ensure this situation?

We'll hold the funds of the IDO 1month before sending it to the project, to make sure there will be no dumps or we'll send back the funds to the IDO buyers.
Also, we'll make sure the team doesn't have more than 10% of the total supply unlocked, they must lock all unused tokens like we did.
So, even if they dump they'll just dump 15% and we'll know that and stop it. Better than dumping 60% of the supply.