i hate to have to agree with @Erdogan, but really leaving negative feedback for everyone who participates in this scam site's signature campaign is something exaggerated, I would accept if they left neutral feedback for anyone who participated in their signature campaign, but this It also raises another question: what if the forum admin allows this scam site to pay for advertising on the forum, would they also leave negative feedback on the forum admin account? I think we should separate things, one thing is this site being a scam and another thing is their suignature campaign that it would be up to each person to participate or not according to the conscience that they would be promoting some scam
Check out all the accounts that have been participating... Lol
About 98% had negative feedback already prior to promoting 1xbit. And I fully support any DT member that red tags any account willing to advertise scam. Let's stop having double standards here because money is involved.
I think you have already seen accounts getting tagged in the past for promoting malicious links, either on their signatures or posts. In fact, these days, they even get instantly banned. What is the difference between promoting malicious links and promoting a scam like 1xbit?
They tried tricking Theymos once via a third party and admin was notified. He removed the ads Immediately and donated the money they had paid.