Unfortunately, anyone who joins the 1xbit signature campaign automatically receives a negative trust. I think that 1xbit campaign manager would be very happy to accept users with a positive or at least neutral trust to the campaign, but no one wants to risk make their rank worse.
Members who have no history of scams in the past will never be interested in promoting a scam website like 1xbit. The accounts that are participating in the 1xbit er signature campaign have already been tagged for various bad deeds. So it seems to me that no good intentional forum member would support such a website, which has hundreds of complaints against it. 1xbit until they can avoid this scamming purpose and will be interested in increasing their own reputation until no reputed member joins their signature campaign.
I see you have closed the circuit in this discussion. My statement was a response to @Baskin198's offer to hire trusted members:
2- Like stake has hired some puppets, you need to hire some trusted members. Yes it costs money but look they defend you against all the victims and go as far as tagging the victim himself as one of the stake puppet does.
We can only guess who would like to join the 1xbit signature campaign. If everyone gets a red trust automatically, we won't find out, because no one wants to spoil their account and prefere make safe money from other campaigns.