Quote from: Wind_FURY on April 09, 2022, 11:41:38 AM

It will be a complicated issue from an idealistical perspective, but I believe in educating newbies and letting them make their own decisions as long as they know the risks/danger of what they want to do.

I agree with that as well, but the problem of that approach is that when it comes to privacy, many newbies have completely compromised themselves long before they understand the full implications of what they have done. Once you have completed KYC at a centralized exchange or two, withdrawn those coins to a closed source wallet dependent on centralized services like Blockchain.com or Coinomi that can see all your addresses and everything you do, then it becomes impossible to wipe the slate clean and start again. By the time a newbie realizes the importance of maintain at least some of their privacy, their KYC documents are already all over the internet and blockchain analysis companies already have a profile on them.

And again, I see no risk in my coins being tainted. I'm not going to use any entity which pays any attention to taint, because by doing so those entities are anti-bitcoin.

Quote from: nopara73 on April 09, 2022, 08:37:21 PM

zkSNACKs is a company with over 30+ people already and opinions on blacklisting varies to a great degree from "this should'd been done long time ago" to "we must start working on decentralized coordination protocols."

And you don't see the problem of a so called "privacy service" employing people who think that censoring users isn't going far enough? Wow.