Quote from: n0nce on April 10, 2022, 03:36:39 PM

Quote from: Wind_FURY on April 10, 2022, 08:53:22 AM

OK, if you say so. But I personally don't want to be responsible if newbies' coins are withheld by an exchange just because I told them "there is no danger". Especially newbies who are Coinbase users.

Does everyone see the contradiction in the bold highlighted part?
Wind_FURY; you care about your friends' funds, yet allow them to use a centralized exchange? How does that make any sense?

You're nitpicking ser. You know what the real practical situation is among users, old and new. If you disagree, or believe that I am wrong in my personal opinions in this matter, that's not a problem ser. You do you. Cool

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on April 10, 2022, 05:56:42 PM

Quote from: Wind_FURY on April 10, 2022, 08:53:22 AM

OK, if you say so. But I personally don't want to be responsible if newbies' coins are withheld by an exchange just because I told them "there is no danger". Especially newbies who are Coinbase users.

If the user is already neck deep in fully-KYCed zero-privacy zero-sovereignty bottom-of-the-barrel centralized exchanges like Coinbase, then I can completely understand where you are coming from. But as n0nce has correctly pointed out, the enemy here isn't the privacy protecting techniques and services; it is the centralized exchanges which are fighting against your basic rights.

If a grocery store said "You can't shop with us unless you provide us a copy of your bank statement", then no one would say "You better make sure you use a bank which provides PDF statements", but rather everyone would say "Don't use that store".
If an employer said "You can't work with us unless you provide us a copy of your entire internet browsing history", then no one would say "Make sure you never use incognito mode", but rather everyone would say "Don't work for that employer".
If a bank said "You can't open an account with us unless we can see all your online chat history", then no would say "Make sure you use insecure and unencrypted messaging apps", but rather everyone would say "Don't use that bank".

If an exchange says "You can't use us unless you provide a copy of all your documents and let us monitor all your financial dealings and transactions", then why do people say "Make sure you comply and don't use any privacy protecting techniques" rather than "Don't use that exchange"?

Ser, no need to be hyped up with this situation. Relax, it's merely an opinion. If you don't share it, then let's agree to disagree. I'm simply starting to believe that Bitcoin shouldn't be "black" or "white".