I can't understand why would a company pay to read a CV while they could have tons of them for free --and most ends up on the trashcan-- just by opening a job vacancy. Sure, you could say that the CV you offered will be more accurate with the specifications they asked for candidates, and they can cut their budget of hiring a HR staff because everything is automated by your platform, thus allowing them to allocate their HR payments to pay for the CV you provide, but that's not gonna work in real practice.
CV would only allows HR --be it human or automated-- to filter candidates through their hard skills, but what'll matter for companies and what'll be point used to consider hiring one candidate over another is their soft skill, which can be hard --borderline impossible-- for a robot to verify. In other words, the companies will still need their HR and wouldn't, couldn't, replace them with your system.
https://i.ibb.co/MV5CVFX/Flowchart.jpgHello,
thanks for your point of view.
I state that one of the founders of the team is a professional HeadHunter.
I can assure you that in the world of Information Technology where the job offer exceeds the demand, it is not so simple and obvious to retrieve a CV.
IT talent receives dozens of contact requests daily. Allowing them to reward them for these contacts and give them the ability to choose who can see their sensitive data is greatly appreciated.
What we want to do is put ourselves on the side of the candidate and not the companies.
We remain available for further comments.
Greetings
Ok, so if... it's very easy to get a job offer in IT department as the offers --a company seeking an employee-- are greater than the available applicants, and that the IT people are receiving dozens of contract offers daily, why would they bother applying some more on your platform? Wouldn't they could just sat nicely in their home and job offers come to them?
