Ok. I understand what you are saying now. But what doesn't make sense to me, is why would the government force them to close bank accounts by April 15th, if they wanted to give them another 3 months to operate before making potential new decisions?
It seems like by setting a date of April 15th, that they putting an end to the exchanges.
Or, are you implying that you don't think closing access to banking accounts will necessarily end the exchanges and there might be work arounds allowed (potentially with a 3 month review)?
Sorry, I skipped lines: I meant to say "in this speculation the leaked-order is an intention that is replaced by a talk, and BTER didn't get a chance to talk, so their accounts closed as planned". I should have added this line where I said "I do not doubted the recent ban existed
in cetain form". But then again, I am thinking Chinese, that line is really not necessary for a local reader.
Don't forget that I also speculated sluggish execution, and more news to come.