Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 09:29:38 AM

It's not certain that your coins will be held until you provide more info, neither that they won't be accepted because they're blacklisted, but is it worth it? I mean, you're mixing to get privacy, but you're going straight to those anti-private and ambiguously deceitful companies? That's like pulling the devil by the tail.

Well, let's say somebody has 1000 BTC as a single input. Maybe he doesn't want to tell the CEX he has 1000 BTC and a mixer does that even if only 0.1 BTC is mixed and the rest is kept "clean".
It's not my case (I wouldn't have mind it was Cool

), but privacy can go in various ways.

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 09:29:38 AM

I'm in the favoring position to have never used any centralized exchange. I only exchange decentrally whenever I want, whatever I want, with whoever I want. I'm mixing, because I can; because it's primarily a smart decision.

It's a smart decision indeed, and I think that you're one of the lucky few that could actually do that. I think that the majority just won't. Unfortunately.

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 09:29:38 AM

Using a centralized exchange, hoping that your coins will be approved means you're somewhat agreed with this "taint" rule, which is against the principles of bitcoin.
And that's just one of the many reasons you should avoid CEX.

True. But I don't think that they're keen to lose customers and get some drama instead.
Of course, if one sends 1 mixed BTC to CEX in one step, he's "asking for it".

What I've done was basically testing with rather small amounts.