Quote from: JollyGood on Today at 02:19:21 PM

Quote from: yahoo62278 on Today at 01:19:35 PM

What Pmalek said is true, No amount of pressure on me will get you anywhere. I have nothing to do with your case. I said I would send a message to the team and try to have them reply, and I have done so. That's the end of my involvement in your case. When a person is trying to help you out you should say thank you, not pm them on telegram multiple times or try to ask people to "pressure" me on here. I didn't take anything from you so there is 0 pressure on me pal.

If I had an answer for you that would help you with your case, I would have posted it already or answered you on telegram.

Absolutely correct, you had nothing to do with this issue at all because you were only the campaign manager for Gamdom and their campaign ended on 16th May 2022

After you contacted them, if Gamdom decided to not make any statement related to the scam allegation then that is not down to you. I hope the OP appreciates the fact you contacted Gamdom to let them know about this scam allegation because you really have no involvement in the case. The OP should not contact you via PMs or Telegram.

Quote from: yahoo62278 on Today at 01:19:35 PM

I don't know if you're telling the truth or full of shit currently. I find it odd that not one other person has made any claim against gamdom that I am aware of. Usually when we see a scam accusation, we see multiple accusations against said casino.

Though there is merit in what you say I think it is not impossible that the OP was scammed out of 4.29 BTC. He is adamant he had 4.29 BTC in his account when the account was closed and he claims Gamdom closed his account after he began complaining about why he was not being allowed to cash out.

What might have happened was he had 4.29 BTC account balance before Gamdom reduced the Lil Devil win from 14,491x to 1338x otherwise his calculations do not add up but for now, based on what has been discussed, I think it would wrong to dismiss what the OP is stating.

Let us not forget you mentioned in a different post that Gamdom told you they compensated the OP for the delay in topping up the hot wallet which made it impossible for him to withdraw his winnings and they deemed the matter closed. They did not provide you with any evidence such as tx id or hot wallet address which would prove the hot wallet was empty and would demonstrate they paid funds to the OP. As for the OP, he denies receiving any compensation or any funds from Gamdom including his own winnings.

Though you have no association now with Gamdom and have no control over what they decide to do in this scam allegation, they can settle this whole issue by making a statement to include:

- their version of events
- the hot wallet address so balance can be checked at the times the OP tried to withdraw and cash out, but was declined
- the transaction id which demonstrates they made a payment to the OP
- a full explanation why they reduced a 14,491x win to just 1338x after the event, after the bet was won

Quote from: yahoo62278 on Today at 01:19:35 PM

I don't plan on responding here unless I have something to post from the casino.

That is understandable and the correct course of action. The silence however on part of Gamdom in this matter is somewhat striking as they have not defended a serious scam allegation against them.

I do appreciate Yahoo making initial contact. I don’t however, appreciate this as his public reply.

“ Take a look at his screenshot from the Mod conversation. You'll notice the conversation is from December of last year. User tried to wd while hot wallet was empty. He was given some compensation for the wait and now is on some sort of crusade trying to hurt the casinos rep.

I wouldn't worry about whatever he has to post. He just keeps reposting the same screenshots and hoping the community gets joins his attack”

I think this is personally insulting, since I’ve supported my claims against Gamdom, with evidence to every claim. Yet; Gamdom simply mentions in a conversation to Yahoo, that “op has been paid compensation and we refilled wallets” and he instantly sided with them and told others not to take notice of evidence.

This is why I (possibly wrongly) contacted Yahoo via telegram with direct proofs of everything, something that Gamdom has not and can not do. Yahoo being pointed out to me as the campaign manager was the reason I contacted him directly on here -
Ignoring me after wrongfully stating that above, I wanted to correct him through personal contact. Sorry if this wasn’t right. Please don’t think I’m trying to argue with the user Yahoo, I’m simply stating he was wrong to make that claim since you’ve been provided with no proof, as it doesn’t exist.

Excuse the little rant. It’s not a small amount of money and I am severely frustrated with Gamdom at this point.

Quote from: saxydev on Today at 04:17:25 PM

What do you mean you are only the campaign manager? You are the direct link between gandom and this forum.. If someone joins while seeing the bitcointalk signature, you have no responsability to what you are the manager of the advertising?!?

Where is their official reply to this topic in months? Gandom is only a gateway for big time gaming, they can't lower the potential of a game, it's not possible, the game is tested with millions of spins with certain results and checked on the long term to have the theoretical rtp. If you lower the potential, the rtp is way less than the one advertised by them and that's SCAM! by every spin made by any player since the game goes on their site.

I thought campaign managers were casino reps, it was pointed out to me by another user that Yahoo ran their campaign here - at time of initial contact with Yahoo I wasn’t aware what a campaign was, let alone aware that yahoo ran campaigns on behalf of companies. This all came to me after - at the time I thought he was the official rep.

They have no official statement, not apology.
It’s not the RTP being questioned;
It’s why was the game showing 36,000x now only capped to 1,338x

As other users have pointed out - the game would have stayed “maximum single round bet won” my win wasn’t even half of stated potential. Shocking behaviour