Quote from: libertasbella on Today at 04:37:32 AM

Quote from: Chambulla on May 22, 2022, 12:55:04 AM

Here is an interesting thought:
My friend says that as American politicians are corrupt they can all be hung, shot in the head, or drawn and quartered. And this is legal by common law as they are traitors.
But if this is the case why hasn't it been done already?

Because that's how Stalin rose to power.

This is for the US only. To be able to do it lawfully...

1. Find 3 friends (or more) who will work with you every step of the way.

2. If possible, round up 30 friends who will follow the process, understanding what is going on.

3. The politician in question must have harmed someone. The harm can be emotional under some circumstances.

4. You, the harmed, must notice the politician, man to man (not man to politician) to stop doing what he has been doing. There must be sufficient explanation in the notice so that anybody reading it can see the harm.

5. The notice must be directed to the man (not the politician), and the man must respond, not his secretary or attorney. A minimum of 3 notices must be sent with a minimum of 21 days between notices. If the man responds, his responses must be addressed. If he stops harming you, there is no further need for continuing your noticing, except if you need compensation for harm he has done to you. If he harms you more, subsequent notices must include 'cease and desist' on the new harm methods, as well as the original. All notices must be traceable as to their having been sent. A process server would be good for this.

6. File a common law form similar to an indictment with the clerk of court in the living area of the man/politician. This form includes the harm he has done to you, the fact that you noticed him (verified copies of process serving), and your demand for the death penalty as compensation. Note that there is generally no place for record keeping of common law forms in the clerk's office. They will require you to file in some other way. This means that you will need a cover letter for your forms that lets the court know that you filed as you did to fit the record keeping methods of the clerk's office, but that your case is really common law.

7. The date of the trial, the judge will ask who is representing you or if you are representing yourself. THIS IS IMPORTANT. You are NOT being represented. You are PRESENT WITHOUT REPRESENTATION. Make sure your 30 friends from #2 above, are with you, witnessing the judge for activity that might go against the rules of court. These guys can become a grand jury to indict the judge for illegal behavior.

8. The man/politician isn't required to be in court. But his absence means a default judgment in your favor. His attorney isn't allowed to speak for him if you aren't represented. This is a man-to-man court. If he is present to argue his case, you will need to show how you were harmed or damaged, and to prove he is the one who did it to you. If you win...

9. Now the fun begins, getting the local sheriff to carry out the judgment, throwing the guy in prison to be executed. This, again, is where your 30 friends come in handy... if you start the process over with the sheriff for not doing his job. The 30 are for the various grand juries you will need along the way to indict the various law enforcement people, and even the governor of the state if he tries to pardon the man/politician in question.

The point being, this is gonna be work. But if enough of us got together and learned a little bit of the law, we could straighten up Biden and Congress, and even get rid of the IRS.

Note that there is a very interesting method for beating almost any illegal thing that any politician or other government official does against you, IF IT THREATENS YOU OR HARMS YOU. Check out https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXQpigzS9uc. You probably won't understand it if you haven't listened to some of the other videos.

Note that there is an older court decision, I believe from the Alaskan Circuit Court, that actually states that government officials can be executed if they won't stop their illegal activities. I have not done any shepardizing of the case the decision is based on, but I have heard that it still stands as a valid decision. Do you think you can find this case?

Cool