Quote from: DireWolfM14 on May 23, 2022, 08:30:17 PM

Quote from: PaperWallet on May 23, 2022, 07:52:10 PM

For choosing the Escrow there are no rules, except that the limit date is 25th of may. Or I might do the giveaway myself. I am unable to do all of this for getting people to rule on this flag and the Escrow does not. I simply need any trusted member to come out and say "I made up my mind" and he'll get the money. Only afterwards he'll rule. And believe me I won't be disappointed for whatever he does. On the other hand I won't be neither trying to interfere in his work whatsoever nor trying to argue with him on why he opposed the flag or.... I'll just leave him alone.

That's a silly stipulation, and to be honest it makes me think that you're not really committed to honoring the lottery. In your position, I would want someone who's not participating in the giveaway to manage the money, if for no other reason than to ensure impartiality from the escrow.

Quote from: PaperWallet on May 23, 2022, 07:52:10 PM

I will be checking Switzerland thks.

Lol, Switzerland already gave you his answer.

Quote from: PaperWallet on May 23, 2022, 07:52:10 PM

And last, if you want to state clear ToS to be in line with what they actually did, it would be (in italicized what they DON'T put in their terms)
-We reserve the right, to cancel any identical bets and consider only the first bet as valid.

That sounds pretty clear to me; i.e. they can cancel the bets. It doesn't say that they can cancel the bet only before the event. It's obvious they don't want people making duplicate bets on their site, probably because they want to limit the prize to something they can afford to pay. So, either find another site without a limit or without a duplicate-bet stipulation, or don't duplicate your bets on FortuneJack.

Maybe their terms aren't as clear as they can be, but what is clear and obvious; you were engaging in funny business, and they're protecting themselves from your shenanigans.

Ok you think I am not committed, but I said I am. Maybe you live around people or come from a place where it is ok for someone's word not to be good.

Then go ahead and please oppose the flag. Believe me it would be fun to see how many members oppose it.
I am saying I have been SCAMMED. If you agree with LoyceV, then it would be something for a judge to determine and not an outright scam and not that clear, and something so complicated. You both with LoyceV should oppose it.

If you were to take the rules with that very basic and "stupid" (in a positive sense) interpretation, then:
"which team will win the rest of the match"
"final result"
maybe for any English speaking person are not identical bets?

If you were to have just a little more sense of some unwritten rules in life, like if you deal with somebody he's not supposed to steal you, then just maybe, bets 2, 3 and 4 were outright scams.

At some point I can't argue with bad faith.

In any case, good luck everyone.