Quote from: be.open on Today at 09:58:03 AM

Quote from: OutOfMemory on Today at 09:45:50 AM

Remember Stalingrad?
Sure, there are differences, but in essence the (original) nazis were led into exhaust.
And yes, you need an advantage between 4:1 to 10:1 in equipment to attack and hold a region, but this isn't everything. You need skilled personell, motivated and healthy soldiers, experienced commanders and, most important, steady supply. Who cares about 20 times more in weapons when it's a question of time to see them transformed into a rusty pile of metal?
It's also starting to boil inside Russia, more and more people don't want to get poor and lose their sons MIA because of this war.
Victory?

I think it is still somewhat premature to talk about the victory of Russia. But even Gordon recently said that "to date, Ukraine has completely lost the Kherson region, partly the territory of the Kharkiv region, most of the territory of the Zaporozhye region, significant territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. In this regard, to say that today we are something received, you can't. Of course, Putin received a lot".

Ukraine has no chance against Russia and never had. Even with general mobilization and unprecedented support from the West, Ukraine is losing to Russia's peacetime armies. If you think otherwise, stop taking hard drugs during daylight hours.

Even Kissinger agrees with you:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2022/05/23/henry-kissinger-warns-against-defeat-russia-western-unity-sanctions/

“I hope the Ukrainians will match the heroism they have shown with wisdom,” he said, adding with his famous sense of realpolitik that the proper role for the country is to be a neutral buffer state rather than the frontier of Europe.