Quote from: gemstar5000 on April 01, 2014, 07:45:37 PM

Quote from: Elated on April 01, 2014, 07:21:27 PM

Quote from: patmast3r on March 31, 2014, 03:34:45 PM

Quote from: j23a on March 31, 2014, 03:03:01 PM

Quote from: jyou17 on March 31, 2014, 02:25:04 PM

What is this talk about dropping members who have posted only once or a few times? I don't feel it would be that fair to people like me. I have no relevant skills to help out with the project, but I am following it closely as it really looks magnificent and well thought out and I feel there is great potential. I helped out by buying a stake for almost $80AUD, so why should I be kicked from the stakeholders list? I could post more frequently, but the posts wouldn't be of much use and would be buried by the more important stuff.

I understand that everyone is trying to make it the fairest it can be, however we need to be careful. A lot of legitimate new comers put real money into this and it would quite harsh to boot them. As I mentioned I put in almost $80AUD and shortly after the price dropped significantly (over 50%) as a bonus to the last few new comers. I don't mind as I really saw potential with the project and it looks like my investment is paying off, but I would be extremely sad and disappointed if I was kicked from the stakeholders list simply because I didn't post enough. I may not have much to show for on this forum, but I mean it doesn't mean I haven't talked to my friends and people at my uni about the coin.

This is my first cryptocurrency I've put some real (real to me as I don't have much) money into, and I really hope I get to stay a part of it. The developers are doing an outstanding job and the wallet mock-ups look great. I can't wait until the alpha comes.

It was the suggestion of one guy and one guy only. Utopianfuture has made the rules pretty clear, and from what I've seen he would be very against such a suggestion. It would not be fair at all to the legitimate stakeholders in the bunch.

Being inactive will only byte you if you are a sockpuppet. If an account pops up during taint analysis and then also shows almost zero acitivity it is very likely to be a sockpuppet and that's when it may be refunded (depending on wether or not the person reacts to the accusation and in what way).

Here's hoping this is indeed true. I would certainly be considered one of those inactive accounts, however, I read these forums for more time everyday than I care to admit. I'm very new to not only this community but also crypto in general and until I have something solid and worthwhile to contribute, I'd rather continue to lurk. I am a tremendous supporter and fan of NEM, however, and all it stands for.

It is a bit ridiculous to say we can have a second stake for a loved one/friend/relative but must be from a separate account then say inactive accounts are sock puppet accounts. I'm sure most of those 'second accounts' (like this one) appear relatively inactive. After the worst offenders are weeded out, do the rest really matter?? Once the coin realizes a value and can be traded there will be mass dumps whether it is 1000 people dumping 1 stake each or 5 people dumping 200 stakes each. Anyways enough said, I've already criticized this thread for the level of S.P. talk.

I agree that is ridiculous, and luckily it is all gossip. Like patmaster mentioned, it was just a suggestion, and a suggestion that was not given by someone from the dev team.
No NEM stakeholder will be "kicked" from the stakeholder list solely because they have a low post count, and I'd bet my NEM stake on that!