Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 03:28:17 PM

Cooperating with a chain analysis company and blacklisting "illegal" outputs arbitrarily contradicts with the "Reclaim your privacy now" sign and their beliefs that privacy is a fundamental human right.

Pretty much this. It is disgusting enough that they are now anti-bitcoin and pro-censorship, but to add more insult to injury, they continue to blatantly lie in their advertising, and their website still includes such incredibly hypocritical statements such as this one:

Quote from: https://docs.wasabiwallet.io/why-wasabi/TransactionSurveillanceCompanies.html#attempt-to-destroy-fungibility

The aim of bitcoin is to be a decentralized digital currency, but if all users are eventually required to consult centralized blacklists before accepting bitcoin, then its decentralization will be destroyed.

Wouldn't it be horrendous for your wallet to have to consult a centralized blacklist before allowing you to coinjoin your bitcoin. Right!? Roll Eyes

Or maybe this one:

Quote from: https://docs.wasabiwallet.io/FAQ/FAQ-GeneralBitcoinPrivacy.html#how-is-financial-privacy-an-essential-element-to-fungibility-in-bitcoin

If Bitcoin fungibility is too weak in practice, then it cannot be decentralized: if someone important announces a list of stolen coins they won't accept coins derived from, you must carefully check coins you receive against that list and return the ones that fail. Everyone gets stuck checking blacklists issued by various authorities because in that world we'd all not like to get stuck with bad coins. This adds friction and transactional costs and makes Bitcoin less valuable as money.

So by their own admission, they are working to make bitcoin less valuable as money.

And of course, absolutely no mention on their website that they are cooperating with blockchain analysis and censoring their users. In fact, they strongly imply that they are not doing such a thing here:

Quote from: https://docs.wasabiwallet.io/FAQ/FAQ-Introduction.html#can-the-coordinator-attack-me

The only known possible 'malicious' actions that the server could perform are two sides of the same coin;

Blacklisted UTXO's: Though this would not affect the users who are able to successfully mix with other 'honest/real' peers.

This is incredibly dishonest. Using the language of "Here is a thing we could do" strongly implies they are not doing it, when we know that the exact opposite is true.

Quote from: Poker Player on Today at 04:52:13 PM

I have been studying the case and it seems to me that the key is here:

But they admitted that there are no court cases, laws, or regulations which are forcing them to do this:

Quote from: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/business/wasabi-wallet-explains-new-bitcoin-censorship

However, zkSNACKs co-founder and CEO Bálint Harmat told Bitcoin Magazine that the decision to prevent some users from leveraging Wasabi for their privacy needs was a proactive one as there is no current legislation obliging them to do so.

Wasabi's anti-privacy and pro-censorship stance is entirely voluntary.