Quote from: Poker Player on Today at 03:34:35 AM

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on June 14, 2022, 03:28:27 PM

... and the bitlucy website has been down for over 24 hours. Maybe it's too early to call it an exit scam. Or is it?

I've just checked and it's not down.

I know:

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on June 14, 2022, 05:33:17 PM

he announces that the site is back on line, but...

That's exactly my issue with this situation. Let me explain: When the site was down there was no point in tagging Royse777. There was no risk of them taking more deposits which would later become unavailable withdrawals. The fact that the site came back up, and Royse777 continues to promote it, while clients weren't allowed to withdraw puts BitLucy's scam level in 1xBit territory. That's why I feel it's justified to leave that tag. It seems like the site has no issue accepting deposits, but until they are issuing withdrawal requests I don't think anyone should make a deposit. That's my justification for the red-tag.

And to yahoo62278's point, specifically:

Quote from: yahoo62278 on Today at 02:10:31 PM

Any actions like a negative can be edited or removed once issues are corrected and the website is working properly.

I've never been the type to etch my reviews in stone. If things start working normally and everyone gets their withdrawals as expected my tag will be removed.

Quote from: stompix on Today at 01:07:40 PM

I'm going to follow Rikafip and SFR10 on this and I'm removing the avatar and text, it makes no sense for me neither to advertise nor to get paid for advertising something that does work 100%, bitlucy needs to fix the issues, needs to fix whatever is wrong with customer support and their one engine and then start a promotional campaign and an advertising one.

Thank you for posting here. So far I know of BlackHatCoiner, Stompix, Rikafip, and SFR10 as members who voluntarily chose to stop promoting BitLucy. Rather than punish those who haven't acted I think it's important to recognize those who do.