I'll dedicated a topic to this.
Rest assured I won't be joining that discussion - as I said last week:
Two of the three (three being 6.9% of the 43 UID's as reported today) are alts. It was canvassed in another thread their attacks on me. This person has subsequently left me alone (at least I presume they have - I have them on ignore and no one has alluded to their attacks continuing) - that said, perhaps it is time to review my previous trust feedback - I still think they would be untrustworthy in a trade, but I can convey that in neutrals I suppose.
I've been busy this week:
https://loyce.club/trust/2022-06-18_Sat_05.13h/131361.htmlhttps://loyce.club/trust/2022-06-18_Sat_05.13h/2640757.htmlBut, if you want to waste your time nasal gazing - feel free to do so. But first - may I quote you?
I noticed the negative feedback from 2 DT-accounts yesterday. I don't think I've seen something like this before, and I don't think this is how the Trust system is supposed to be used. One person should not give someone positive or negative feedback from more than one account, as it leads to 2 positive or -2 negative on the user's profile.
A simple solution would be if hilariousandco uses hilariousetc for all feedbacks on your account.