Quote from: PaperWallet on Today at 06:43:01 PM

Quote from: edgycorner on Today at 04:49:08 PM

Quote

You can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.

If you believe they are in the wrong, then question them instead of bombarding adjectives. This is only hurting your case. Take a smoko.
Please be respectful.

You should be asking these questions instead of picking fights with other members

Quote

Question FJ intention behind that clause, and how they determine which bets to cancel under that clause.

Good luck. I won't participate in this discussion anymore.

Ok thank you for the advice, but all of those questions were asked. It didn't help my flag, even if some acknowledged that this is pure theft. Although I feel no regrets because -for the most part- they're already set in their mind of what they should do, and I've already explained it.

They don't want to increase the cost of +/- scammy websites of being on this forum by forcing them to stop selective scam some big winners, because the promoters will then be less likely inclined to do signature campaigns for them.

You should call evil by its name, and if it is my expression style that makes them support one of their promoters in scamming somebody, let it be, it means they're bad people.

Quote from: edgycorner on Today at 12:36:08 PM

I am not going to get involved in another scam accusation.

Of course you aren't, one of the mob members here gave you a taste of what it should be like for you-as far as your trust score is concerned-if you dare to say something else than what the scam promoters here want.

I really want to stop being a part of this and work on my paper.
I will make one final reply lol

I went through your case again, you did receive 100,000 EUR and their T&C indeed contains the "max win" clause.
I checked previous instances of their T&C, and was able to fetch this https://web.archive.org/web/20200512020750/https://fortunejack.com/faq/sportsbook
Clearly, this term was still there way before your bet. So they did not change any T&C either. It was there before your bet.

The only thing that sticks out is why did they accept your bet? You should have built your case on that. Now it's too late. You have made too many enemies and nobody wants to support you now. Turning it into a very feeble case. It's indeed a very deplorable clause, and they shouldn't have accepted your bet. But it's a question of ethics. This is why your scam accusation couldn't fly.

Your accusation did present the scurvy side of crypto casinos, but we all are aware of it to some extent (like ignoring your married friend's cold sore).

You should move on and enjoy your life while it's still there Wink

Quote

Of course you aren't, one of the mob members here gave you a taste of what it should be like for you-as far as your trust score is concerned-if you dare to say something else than what the scam promoters here want.

Read my reply about it. I couldn't be more accurate about what happened. It was all ego and discord.