Quote from: Protagonus on April 02, 2014, 08:10:19 PM

Quote from: bolvan on April 02, 2014, 09:53:43 AM

After april 06 what miner parameters should be changed ?

for cgminer / ultracoinminer / sgminer
one or more of these:
-Thread Concurrency
-Lookup Gap
-Threads
-Intensity
-Worksize

Quote from: pym002 on April 02, 2014, 06:23:34 PM

hello,
it is or wholesale level mining efficiency by mh / s normal?
thank you in advance for your response

You may be using the wrong miner program. You should be showing efficiency by Kh/s.
Try one of these:
http://ultracoin.net/mining.html
or
https://github.com/Thirtybird/YACMiner/releases

Quote from: cointradero on April 02, 2014, 07:03:00 PM

Quote from: jinni7241500aa on April 02, 2014, 06:31:09 PM

Quote from: cointradero on April 01, 2014, 11:12:48 PM

Am I the only one concerned that the coin founder literally won't put 1 dime of his own money towards his own coin? All financial risk must be taken on by the community every time. He could have sold some of his own UTC, he could put it on a credit card, he could do a lot of things besides asking you people to shoulder the burden yet again.

I'm glad some of you do it willingly, but the fact that he won't pony up a penny drives me insane.

Developers do not invest money in the coin itself
The final profit is again who?
Let us think about this problem?
We give them the money

I have no idea what you just said.

Based off the other posts and thus taking the assumption of not a troll; a better word choice may have been:

Developers are not the ones, who put value into the coin itself. (miners / investors are)
Who gets to profit off the value of this coin? (inference traders / miners)
who best to solve this problem then?
We give them the money (those whom profit off value and put value in. e.g. traders , investors, miners)

I realize you're just trying to interpret, but there is an odd logical circle there. Developers don't add value to the coin.... but we are to give them money to solve the problems we're having.... though they add no value.

And I'm not going into the obvious statement of profit when most Devs take a chunk of it for themselves. In this case, a very hefty chunk. I don't care if it is supposedly going to be invested in the coin or not. If UTC died tomorrow for some odd reason, He would still have ASICs worth a ton or potentially will make a ton of money with. It's a win / win. If UTC doesn't die, he still has 100,000 UTC that was provisioned for himself. That certainly seems like profit to me.

The point of my original comment was, in the end, Bumface stands to profit one way or another, but seems unwilling to risk anything personally for it. I don't think the statement was invalid and some don't see it as a problem. From a technical standpoint it isn't, but it doesn't strike me as someone who really believes there is long term value as every nickel out of his pocket today seems to bankrupt him when he's sitting on a pile of premine gains that you all prop up through mining and trading. You're already shouldering a ton of the work, I just get upset when I see something come up that, by every right, he should dip into his own funds to take care of, yet he asks again for your help.

I'll give it to you all for dedication at this point, but don't completely be blind in your support just because you want to believe. That's fanaticism.