Quote from: Geode on April 02, 2014, 08:29:40 PM

Quote from: blade87 on April 02, 2014, 08:25:13 PM

Quote from: moderndezigns on April 02, 2014, 08:00:26 PM

Quote from: Relaxedsense on April 02, 2014, 07:56:29 PM

I'm sorry to say, but can we please stop with the BC vs. Mint BS.

Cheers

If the same people that are ALWAYS starting crap in Mintcoins forums quits I'm fine with it and will move on too and let you guys scam whoever you please although I don't feel it's right I cant save the world. Also the crap this morning about attack shit was a bit much and it would be nice if blackcoin folks were trying to be helpful but from history one can't make such assumptions.

You should just make a new account and start over. You've not only hurt your own position, but the position of the rest of the MINT community. And I say that owning some MINT myself. While I'm not active in the MINT community, I do like to be diversified and you haven't made me feel good about my MINT position at all today.

I should have just posted this over in the MINT thread, but then I might get accused of being a troll too.

Why diversify into MINT when they are having issues, big ones?

The issues are being fixed, so you can give up the fear-mongering now. Thanks.

Quote from: gonzoucab on April 02, 2014, 08:54:23 PM

Quote from: maarx on April 02, 2014, 08:51:43 PM

Quote

static const int CUTOFF_POW_BLOCK = 220000;

if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > CUTOFF_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : No proof-of-work allowed anymore (height = %d)", nHeight));

https://github.com/mintcoinproject/mintcoin/commit/dad79713d4172a569238de1b736abfbf307acfbd

Welcome to POS only guys

That doesnt mean that, mint will keep Hybryd!

read:

http://www.netcoin.io/wiki/Algorithms_for_PoS_Voters_to_Assess_the_Validity_of_PoW_Blocks

We are changing cutoff of blocks that attack, but this parametter need to be adjusted for the network size.

I doesnt need a FORK!!!

Clean solution from DEVS!