Quote from: _BlackStar on Today at 10:08:27 AM

I don't like spam and it made me try to avoid spam posts as best as possible and it also made me decide to report a number of spammers to moderators over the time. I reported a number of spammer profiles and posts to the moderators on the gambling board ^{[some of which were handled good],} but from most of those reports I got unsatisfactory results as they were not handled to this day. I have said time and time again that my 100+ reports on the gambling board are not handled regardless of the reason and that made me stop doing it.

Would you say they were rather subjective, and could pass as good or bad depending on the user reviewing it? Like, some posts are so obviously spam, there would be universal agreement. However, when you get to the borderline cases as I like to call them, that's when reports usually go unhandled. They've definitely been seen, I'm quite confident of that.

I usually leave reports unhandled, when I don't necessarily disagree why the post was reported, but don't think it warrants enough action. Although, my sections are fairly easy so this doesn't happen very often, but you can see when it does because the reports stay in the report queue for a long time, which gives me the assumption that other moderators also feel the same way about it.