Quote from: eddie13 on June 24, 2022, 12:01:39 PM

Royce, don’t go broke paying people back who were scammed by them..
Maybe the signature payments if you really feel bad about it, but not the deposits..
They knew they were taking risks themselves..

This is a tricky decision to make because even if Royse777 covers the losses will her reputation ever recover? If salvaging reputation is the driving factors behind the decision to make victims whole again the Royse777 might have to make decisions which could impact her financially for a very long time as she tried to make victims whole again.

Quote from: igehhh on June 24, 2022, 12:03:55 PM

He lied about going on a dinner date with the CEO in person; I believe he was aware that the company was broke, but who cares? He was only concerned with his own selfish interests; he was paid and he failed to conduct basic research; I regard him as a person who is easily manipulated. That's where the line should be drawn.

Quote from: igehhh on June 24, 2022, 12:03:55 PM

And yes, they lost it all thanks to Royse777, who assured them that the site was safe and that the owner had been his boyhood friend for a long time! We can't tell if he paid out of his own pocket because there have been so many lies that we don't know what to believe any longer. The flag is valid.

I reconsidered my tag not because I was wrong but because I've never seen him in such a chaotic situation before; he can be trusted, but he lacks management skills; I will not hire or recommend him.

Thankfully the number of victims does not seem to be huge otherwise the amounts being mentioned by victims would be running at astronomical levels.

All those that support the retraction of the flag or support the revision of negative tags to neutral (or even having them removed) are well within their right to feel so but those that think the flag should be supported and that negative trust should be applied) are also within their right to do what they think and follow the course of action they feel is the best way forward in this situation.

By not pulling the plug earlier or by allowing users to deposit funds when they warning signs were bright red is not a small issue, it is a very big issue and by using previous conduct by Royse777 as mitigation is something I am not allowing to cloud my perspective.

I have taken a decision to keep support for the flag and also to not revise nor remove the negative feedback I left. The way I see things are that Royse777 has been grossly negligent on several fronts and in the capacity of being a campaign manager there is added responsibility that comes with the job.

Quote from: igehhh on June 24, 2022, 12:03:55 PM

Quote from: Solosanz on June 24, 2022, 12:00:33 AM

Well thing goes bad after his problem with Bitlucy, his campaign: Unijoin have ended the campaign because of his recent reputation.

Well... Not bad

It must hurt financially though to lose incoming funds when trying to make victims whole again but it is understandable for Unijoin to have taken that stance, it is hard to fault them as their own reputation is at stake.