Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on Today at 08:30:19 PM

Sure. No emotion. As you talk about poking brains with sticks, as if that is in any way whatsoever based in reality. Roll Eyes

Quote from: franky1 on Today at 08:11:45 PM

poled with a stick?.?.? are you a time traveller from the Victorian age where you hear about the 'back room' abortions woman go to because they lack having a proper medical assistance so try to perform it themselves with a friend that found a random stick?..

i hope you do realise what modern abortions are compared to your Victorian views..
let me guess you think appendix surgery is done with pair of rusty scissors and a coat hanger too

i guarantee you, that no modern abortions performed by a doctor trained in abortions is done with a stick

Would forceps and suction devices make you feel better about this? Is that better structured in reality?

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on Today at 08:30:19 PM

So anything which didn't exist in Philadelphia, 1787, shouldn't be protected?

You can make a constitutional amendment if you'd like. You have over two dozen of them.

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on Today at 08:30:19 PM

The 9th Amendment? The 14th Amendment? Or are we fine going after everything from contraception to interracial marriage now because these things aren't explicitly spelt out in the Constitution?

You think interracial marriage isn't included in the constitution?

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on Today at 08:30:19 PM

True textualism there - selectively pick the bits of the text which suit your agenda. Guess they've got plenty of practice with that after doing it with the Bible for so many years.

Where is abortion outlined in the constitution? Why are so many constitutional scholars in agreement that Roe was bad law?

And does this change the fact that the blue states will allow full access to abortion? You might worry about abortion rights when it's outlawed in blue states. It won't be.