Quote from: suchmoon on June 24, 2022, 11:32:55 PM

I think it should be Net 1 but with 2 inclusions minimum (i.e. like the current formula but bumped up by 1).

I like it, this makes even more sense than requiring 2 inclusions.

Quote from: yahoo62278 on June 24, 2022, 11:45:24 PM

I'd like to see 5 inclusions or more personally.

Most of the members with 5 inclusions on DT2 have been on DT1 at some time. Asking for 5 DT1 inclusions makes DT2 harder to reach than DT1, so DT2 will be mostly limited to members who lost the monthly DT1-election.

Quote from: Poker Player on Today at 04:56:25 AM

Quote from: LoyceV on June 24, 2022, 08:06:53 PM

Quote from: Poker Player on June 24, 2022, 07:56:47 PM

And there are not 2723 users in DT2.

That's how exclusions work.

But not exclusions that include a member in DT2.

I only added the negatives to show how many users are excluded. But it doesn't really mean anything for DT2. Most (2443) of the 2723 users with DT1 strength (-1) are excluded by a single DT1-member.

Quote

According to my count from 0 to 12 inclusions there would be 614 members, and according to the last Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings there were 611 DT2 members.

It will probably be because there are at least 3 new DT2s since the last update.

That's not right. It turns out the data I posted on "DT2" in this topic includes DT1-members. I overlooked that last night. The 614 DT2-members you mentioned from my other topic don't double count DT1-members.