Quote from: Richy_T on Today at 03:24:39 AM

Quote from: Khanvila78 on June 25, 2022, 05:36:50 PM

Bitcoin will get to $250K “by late 2022 or early 2023" says Tim Draper.

Bullshit.

doubting thomas.. Roll Eyes

Quote from: ImThour on Today at 06:04:08 AM

Quote from: Richy_T on Today at 04:14:01 AM

Quote from: AnotherAlt on Today at 03:40:29 AM

I don't know if they were daydreaming. Of course, BTC can potentially go $250K or more in the future. That doesn't mean it will Boom in a few months. LOL.

Eventually, sure. And probably sooner than most would think. We're in the doldrums for at least another year though, I think. Healing is needed, bad memories need to fade, confidence needs to return.

Nothing is going to happen before the next halving which is scheduled for May-June 2024.
Do not have any false hopes like those Crypto guys on Twitter.

Bitcoin no doesn't work like that.

Quote from: Arriemoller on Today at 06:14:43 AM

Quote from: ImThour on Today at 06:04:08 AM

Quote from: Richy_T on Today at 04:14:01 AM

Quote from: AnotherAlt on Today at 03:40:29 AM

I don't know if they were daydreaming. Of course, BTC can potentially go $250K or more in the future. That doesn't mean it will Boom in a few months. LOL.

Eventually, sure. And probably sooner than most would think. We're in the doldrums for at least another year though, I think. Healing is needed, bad memories need to fade, confidence needs to return.

Nothing is going to happen before the next halving which is scheduled for May-June 2024.
Do not have any false hopes like those Crypto guys on Twitter.

Nah, I think we will stay around 20 000 to 30 000 ish, maybe with a shortlived drop to 17 000 to 15 000 until winter/christmas, and then a slow rise for the coming two years wit the obligatory skittish jumping around the halving. And then comes the next top of course.

Bitcoin no doesn't work like that, either.

Quote from: death_wish on Today at 08:22:57 AM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on Today at 08:01:19 AM

I know Jbreher used to name drop Coinbase a lot, and probably just to get little digs in here and there.. not that jbreher is particularly mean.. but he was kind of against going along with certain things, including our use of Stamp as our thread price reference.

jbreher is a bigblocker. No wonder he loves Coinbase! Zing!

(Sort of joking. I know he had a sick fetish for Bcash; remind me, what did he think of NYA? He irrationally hated Segwit, so I guess that doesn’t really make sense.)

I am not sure how fruitful it is to remember who said what in terms of the blocksize limitation wars, even though surely from time to time it does come in handy to see those kinds of historical stances that various people/businesses took.

I am pretty sure that jbreher was a bcasher and then pretty much got stuck in the Bcash SV camp, and surely some of that makes little sense because who the fuck would consider that any forkening of Bcash that was promoted/funded by Wright/Ayers would have any semblance of legitimacy but jbreher frequently proclaimed that peeps could still support BcashSV without having to agree with the various claims of Wright et al.

I am pretty sure that jbreher was supporting all of the BIG blocker nonsense from the start - back to late 2015 when Gavin would spout out the various talking points about a need for a path forward and doing all the stuffs on layer one.. so there seems to have been a time in which segwit was proposed and so many of them thought that it was a decent compromise - even Gavin, but then the code was written in early 2016 and then went on testnet and seems that once the segwit code went into its ready to be merged stage then a bunch of the dweebs started to proclaim that segwit was not good any longer, and that would have been around the time of the NYA.. so yeah, I cannot remember jbreher deviating from any of those BIGblocker party line talking points.. including considering the NYA to be a great compromise. If you recall, then vast majority of the strong vocal BIG blocker dweebs did not even care that much about the technical aspects of the big blocker nonsense, but instead they were largely trying to merely change BTC governance to make it easier to change bitcoin however the fuck .. majority rule baloney stuff like that.