Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 09:06:06 AM

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on July 02, 2022, 10:25:36 AM

OpenChange should then inform OP of which custodial service is holding his coins

At first, I didn't think BestChange is to blame, but I'm more and more leaning towards them covering for scammers.
Just like, apparently, exchangers ask customers to deposit to addresses they don't control. That's very shady!

Quote

Allowing OpenChange to repeatedly close his claim despite it being unresolved is incredibly shady.

BestChange helps scammers to hide the truth. I'm starting to think this may deserve a Newbie warning Flag:

Quote

Due to various concrete red flags, I believe that anyone dealing with this user has a high risk of losing money. (This flag will only be shown to guests/newbies.)

@BestChange: any chance you can make your business more customer-centered? If an exchange has negative reviews: show them! Make it 4/128/512 instead of 0/132/512. That looks much more honest.
Also: since you've mentioned "AML legislation" a few times, why are you advertising exchangers with only an email address to identify them? Example:

Quote from: LoyceV on July 01, 2022, 08:34:07 AM

Openchange.cash's Contact page shows an email address. No phone number, no company address, no country of origin.

Despite this, the anonymous site demands KYC from their customers. I don't think that's right.

I agree with this 100%. @Best Change, you know I have a good opinion of you, at least so far, and I also think this case can't just be left at that.